Inhibiting popcorn polymer formation with tertiary amino hydroxy benzene compound



United States Patent US. (:1. 260-6665 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE Popcorn polymer formation in processes for preparing synthetic rubber is inhibited by contacting the monomers with a tertiary amino hydroxy benzene compound having the structure I (CHQNRHWH where R is an alkyl group; In is 0 or 1; R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl radicals, and a benzyl radical; R and R are selected from the group consisting of alkyl radicals, ,B-hydroxyalkyl radicals, and oxydiethylene when R and R together form a single radical; and n is 1 or 2.

This invention relates to the inhibition of the undesirable polymerization of olefinic monomers which gives rise to popcorn polymers and is particularly concerned with the use of certain tertiary amino hydroxy benzene compounds and derivatives as popcorn polymer inhibitors in process relating to the preparation of synthetic rubber.

In the preparation of synthetic rubber from such intermediates as styrene and butadiene (e.g. SBR elastomers) undesirable spontaneous polymerization often occurs in the recovery systems for the olefinically unsaturated monomers. Polymerization may occur to form either a clear, solid, aromatic solvent-soluble polymer or to form an entirely different cross-linked insoluble polymer, known, because of its appearance, as popcorn polymer. While both types of this selfpolymerization are objectionable, the popcorn polymer, which is predominantly formed, is particularly undesirable because it is self-propagating in the presence of the monomer vapor or liquid and not only rapidly fouls the equipment, but is very diflicult to remove ond control. When such popcorn polymers do form it frequently becomes necessary to disassemble the equipment and mechanically remove the accumulations of unwanted polymer.

Much work has been done to find suitable inhibitors to prevent popcorn polymer formation. Nitrites and nitroso compounds have been found to be eifective as have N0 N 0 certain phenolic compounds, sulfur and some aromatic amines. However, most of these agents leave something to be desired for commercially effective use. Some of the agents are difficult to handle; others introduce colored impurities into the recovered olefins; some, although having the desired properties, are too expensive to be of commercial utility. One of the major objections to most of the previously used popcorn polymer inhibitors is their ineffectiveness in the presence of seed; that is, where clean equipment is used, the prior art inhibitors will reduce the tendency for popcorn polymer to form, but once a popcorn polymer seed is formed the inhibitors lose effectiveness. As will be seen, this invention provides popcorn polymer inhibitors which retain their in- 3,518,320 Patented June 30, 1970 hibiting properties even when popcorn polymer seed is in the system.

Because of the uniqueness of the popcorn polymer and the manner in which it is formed, there is no correlation between popcorn polymer inhibition and monomer stabilizers useful to prevent the premature polymerization of olefins during shipping and storage. Accordingly, many agents reported to be stabilizers for olefinic monomers are not effective as popcorn polymer inhibitors. Thus, the problem of popcorn polymer formation in the manufacture of synthetic rubber is peculiar to the monomer recovery system where the monomers are recovered by distillation.

The conventional closed system for the emulsion polymerization of butadiene with styrene (a representative synthetic rubber) comprises a conventional reaction vessel equipped with a stirring mechanism and necessary heating or cooling means in which the monomers are caused to polymerize. After a suitable degree of polymerization is achieved, the polymerization reaction is stopped by the addition of a suitable short stopping agent. The resulting polymer latex is then allowed to flow into a flash tank which is at or slightly above atmospheric pressure and at which time most of the residual butadiene is removed from the latex. The gaseous butadiene is then removed from the flash tank and liquified for reuse. The butadiene-degassed latex is then allowed to flow into a conventional vacuum flash tank where further butadiene and other dissolved gaseous materials are removed. The vacuum flash tank is maintained at a temperature of about F. It is in this vacuum flash tank that the most ideal conditions for popcorn polymer formation exist because the tank is at the proper temperature; the atmosphere above the level of latex contained in the tank contains about 2% or less of butadiene; and a certain amount of catalyst has vaporized and collected on the inner exposed metal surfaces of the tank above the level of the latex. These conditions will initiate popcorn polymer. The popcorn polymer will continue to grow as long as it is fed by a new supply of latex containing a small proportion of butadiene and other polymerizable monomer, such as styrene. The pipe lines leading to and from this vacuum flash tank are also ideal areas for popcorn polymer formation.

The latex is then pumped from the vacuum flash tank to a conventional styrene stripping column where the latex is passed countercurrent to a rising stream of steam causing the styrene to be removed from the latex where it is then recirculated in a conventional manner to the reaction vessel for polymerization with butadiene. In the styrene stripping column popcorn polymer formation also tends to develop unless some precautions are taken to prevent its development.

Preferably, the inhibitor is added to a flash tank used in the process. However, the inhibitor may be introduced to the monomer at any stage in the manufacture of synthetic rubber, as for example during the manufacture, handling, storage, etc. of the intermediates. For example, the inhibitor can be introduced as the gaseous monomer is being passed through pipes, it can be mixed with the monomer in process tanks, or, as indicated, it can be introduced during the fractional distillation of materials in the recovery systems of the rubber manufacturing process. In the preferred technique it is considered best to feed the monomer into a flash tank or fractional distillation column of conventional type. The monomer is subject to fractional distillation using conventional reboiling at the bottom of the column and withdrawal of overhead material at the top, condensing the overhead material and returning a portion of it to the top of the column as reflux. The inhibiting solution is continuously fed, preferably by spraying its solution in water or monomer into the upper portion of the column through which it descends. In other techniques the inhibitor can be introduced to one or more of the monomers in any phase wherein the monomer is being circulated in the process.

The concentration at which the inhibitor is used will usually range from 0.001 to about 5.0 percent by weight of the total monomers (i.e. about to 50,000 parts per million parts of monomer). At concentrations below this value the inhibiting effects are too small to be of significant value. On the other hand, greater amounts may be used, say up to 20%, but such large amounts are not required and are simply wasteful of inhibitor.

Also useful are the equivalent water-soluble salts of the aforedescribed compounds such as the oxalate, acetate, maleate, citrate, glycolate salts, and the like. The salts are sometimes advantageous because of their ready solubility in aqueous latex media. I

The tertiary amino hydroxy benzenes used in this invention are readily obtained by the well-known Mannich reaction involving the reaction of a dihydroxy benzene starting material with a secondary amine and formaldehyde. Such methods of preparing the compounds are described by J. H. Buckhalter et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 68, p. 1894 (1946); W. T. Caldwell et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 61, p. 765 (1949); W. J. Burke et al., J. Org. Chem. 27, p. 4003 (1962); C. Weatherbee et al., J. Org. Chem. 21,

The tertiary amino dihydroxy benzene compounds and p. 1138 (1956); D. L. Fields et al., J. Org. Chem. 29 (9) derivatives which are used to effectively inhibit popcorn p. 2640 (1964). polymer formation according to this invention have the It is to be understood that the specific tertiary amino fo mula compounds embodied herein can be used generally to prevent popcorn polymers in the preparation of polymers and copolymers such as those obtained from ethylenically unsaturated monomers. For homopolymers, the unsaturated monomer will be a conjugated diolefin. The use- OH (CHONRERS) ful conjugated diolefins are exemplified by butadienes 5 such as butadiene-1,3, isoprene, cyanobutadiene-1,3,

chloroprene, 2-phenylbutad1ene, 2,3-d1methylbutadiene- 1,3, and the like. The copolymerizable monomer used X in copolymer formation and which will normally com- (R)m OR prise up to about 70% of the mixture wi l be a monoolefin containing a single CH =CH-- group having at least one of the free valance bonds attached to an electronegative group. Such olefins include aromatic olefins such as styrene, vinylnaphthalene, u-methylstyrene, pchlorostyrene, etc.; the carboxy containing monomers Where R i a alkyl g p having from one to eight Cilfand the corresponding esters, nitriles and amides such n atoms; In is 0 0r 1; is selected from the g p as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, methylmethacrylate, consisting of hydrogen, alkyl radicals having one to five acrylonitrile, methacrylamide, and the like. Preferably, Car on at and a benlyl radical; R2 nd R are sethis invention will be used in recovering the monomers lected from the group consisting Of alkyl radicals havused to make any butadiene-based polymer latex, ing one to five carbon atoms, fl-hydroxyalkyl radica s The following illustrative examples are set forth for having one i five Carbon atoms, and oxydiethylene When evaluation of the unusual effectiveness of the compounds 2 and 3 together m a singl ra and Il is 1 0r of this invention as popcorn polymer inhibitors. The Representative of the preferred compounds useful in technique used for measuring inihibiting effectiveness this invention are: was as follows:

u A one-half gram sample of popcorn polymer seed l y f y Y Q Q from a styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR) plant flask 3 l y f y y q (formed from styrene containing a small amount of 2,6421dlethlflamlnomethyll#991101 butadiene) was placed in a seven ounce bottle previ- 4-(dlicthylammol'nfithyl)resol'clnol ously flushed with nitrogen and containing 30 ml. of 2,5-b{$(mol'phollllomethyllllydfoqulnone r freshly distilled styrene. The bottle was capped with a (B- Y Y Y l y self-sealing cap and 1 ml. of liquid butadiene and the qulnone inhibitor was added through the cap with a hypodermic 2,5-bis(N-ethyl-N-fl-hydroxyethylaminomethyl)hydro- Syringe q e The inhibitor concentration was 0.1% by weight of 2'morphol1nomefllylllydm(111111011e the monomers. The bottles were kept at the elevated 2-dimethylaminomethyl-5- l' y y q temperature of F. and observed until popping (i.e. 2.54315(dl-ll-butylamlnomethyl)hydfoquinone polymerization and formation of popcorn polymer) was 3,6-bis(molipholinometllyllCatechol found. The number of days required for this condition 4,6-bis(morpholinomethyl)resorcinol to occur was recorded. The data are reported in Table I 2-dimethylaminomethyl-4-benzyloxyphenol which follows:

TABLE I Days for popcorn polymer Example No. Inhibitor compound Structural formula formation 1 None 1 2 2,5-bis(dicthylaminomethyl)- OH 35 hydroquinonc. C2115 CHzN C2115 I C2115 NCH2- TAB LE I-Continued Days for po pcorn er Example N0. Inhibitor compound Structural formula f rm i on 12 2-dimetliy1aminomethyl-i benzyl- H 7 oxyphenol CH O HZN O 0 Hz 0 5H5 13 oxlallate salt of compound of Example 11 1 5 C HzN (C4119) 1 4 9) 2N CH2- C 0 O H O H C O O H 1 No polymer observed when test terminated after said number of days.

The foregoing results show that compounds embodied in my invention give outstanding results, which are in contrast to the poor performance of various closely related compounds which impart slight or no inhibition to popcorn polymer formation, for example, such closely related compounds as:

Z-diethylaminomethylphenol 2-diethylaminomethyl-4-t-amylphenol 2-dimethylaminoethylphenol 2-diethylaminomethyl-4-nitrophenol 2-diethylaminomethyl-4-chlorophenol 2-dimethylaminomethyl-4-methyl-6-t-butylphenol Z-dimethylaminomethyl-4-t-amylphenol 2-(N-ethyl-N-B-hydroxyethylaminomethyl)- 4-t-amylphenol 2- morpholinomethyl) -4-t-amylphenol 2,6-bis (dimethylaminomethyl) -4-t-amylphenol 2- di-n-butylaminomethyl -4-t-amylphenol Z-dimethylaminomethyl-p-cresol where R is an alkyl group having from one to eight carbon atoms; m is Q or 1; R is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl radicals having one to five carbon atoms and a benzyl radical; R and R are selected from the group consisting of alkyl radicals having one to five carbon atoms, fi-hydroxyalkyl radicals having one to five carbon atoms, and oxydiethylene when R and R together form a single radical; and n is 1 or 2.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 2,5- bis(diethylaminomethyl)hydroquinone.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor bis(dimethylaminorriethyl)hydroquinone.'

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 3,6- bis(diethylaminomethyl)catechol.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 4- (diethylaminomethyl)resorcinol.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 2,5- bis morpholinomethyl) hydroquinone.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 2,5- bis [N,N-di( B-hydroxyethyl) aminomethyl] hydroquinone.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 2,5- bis(N ethyl-N fl hydroxyethylaminomethyl)hydroquinone.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 2- morpholinomethylhydroquinone.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the inhibitor is 2- dimethylaminomethyl-S-tert-butylhydroquinone.

References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS I 3,135,716 6/1964 Uraneck et al. 26094.7 2,260,475 10/ 1941 Murke 260666.5 2,361,538 10/1944 Franz 260--666.5

OTHER REFERENCES DELBERT E. GANTZ, Primary Examiner J. M. NELSON, Assistant Examiner US. Cl. X.R. 260-94.7 

